Arya by Leoforce pricing is now quote-only. Leoforce retired the Arya brand in 2025, discontinued the per-job Arya Pulse plan ($199-$599 per job), and stopped publishing dollar figures for every product it still sells. Its enterprise products last carried public rate cards of $5,000 to $32,000 per month, and there is still no free tier or trial. For recruiting teams budgeting for AI sourcing in 2026, that means the Arya pricing you’ll find on review sites describes plans you can no longer buy.
Founded in 2012, the company behind Arya is based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and has about 250 employees according to Built In. Founder Madhu Modugu is still CEO. Leoforce says it connects to 60+ ATS and CRM systems, including Bullhorn, Greenhouse ATS, and iCIMS. Its Greenhouse partner listing still claims 850M+ profiles from 80+ channels. Reviewers are cooler on it, though: Software Advice users score its functionality 3.8 out of 5.
This guide covers what Leoforce charges today, what the retired Arya plans used to cost, the expenses no rate card mentions, and five alternatives with published prices. Sticker prices matter less than what a full year of hiring actually costs, so we run that math with real role volumes.
TL;DR:
- Arya pricing is now quote-only. Leoforce retired the Arya brand in 2025, and its current pricing page lists no dollar amounts.
- The old Pulse plan ran $199-$599 per job. It’s discontinued, but review sites still show it, so don’t budget from those numbers.
- Last published enterprise rates ran $5,000-$32,000/mo. Convert and Rediscovery were priced for large organizations, not small teams.
- No free tier or trial exists. You can’t test Leoforce without a sales process.
- Pin publishes every price, starting with a free plan. Paid plans start at $99/mo with 850M+ profiles, and SHRM (2026) finds 27% of organizations already use AI in recruiting.
Arya by Leoforce Pricing: What Each Tier Actually Costs in 2026
Every current Leoforce product is sold by custom quote. According to the company’s pricing page, cost depends on the products you choose, hiring volume, role mix, site traffic, region, and integrations. PricingSaaS, which tracks vendor rate cards, and Software Advice both list Leoforce as custom-quote.
Below is the full lineup, with the last price Leoforce or a third party published for each:
| Product | Pricing Model | Last Published Cost | Status (Sept 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arya Pulse (Self-Service) | Per job | $199/job | Discontinued |
| Arya Pulse (Full-Service) | Per job, managed outreach | $599/job | Discontinued |
| Arya Quantum | Annual subscription | Never disclosed | Discontinued |
| Leoforce Convert | Monthly, by career-site traffic | $8,000-$32,000+/mo | Custom quote |
| Leoforce Rediscovery | Monthly, by database size + open jobs | $5,000-$15,000/mo | Custom quote |
| Leoforce Source | Programmatic job ads | Never disclosed | Custom quote |
| Leoforce Capture | Per qualified applicant | Never disclosed | Custom quote |
| Leoforce Signal | AI sales agent for staffing firms | Never disclosed | Custom quote |
Behind the new model sits an outcome-based pitch: Leoforce’s homepage says that if a candidate does not qualify, you do not pay. That shifts risk onto the vendor, which is appealing. The tradeoff is that you can’t estimate the Arya cost for your team until a sales rep scopes it.
Role volume is what makes per-job and per-outcome pricing expensive. Pin’s data on recruiters who sourced every month from July 2025 through June 2026 shows a median of 11 distinct roles per quarter, roughly 44 a year, and 56% handled 10 or more. At the old $199 Pulse rate, 44 roles came to $8,756 a year. At $599 per role, the same workload cost $26,356.
What did Arya Quantum cost? Nobody outside Leoforce ever knew. Quantum pricing never appeared on Leoforce’s site, G2, or TrustRadius, and the plan is now gone. The same opacity carries over to Source, Capture, and Signal, so buyers still enter a full sales process before they can compare costs.
In our experience building Pin, pricing opacity is a deliberate sales strategy, and it costs recruiting teams more than money. The team behind Pin also built Interseller, which was acquired by Greenhouse. Among teams evaluating AI sourcing tools, the most common complaint was consistent: they couldn’t compare costs before entering a sales funnel. By then, switching costs were real, and their bargaining power was gone.
By contrast, Pin takes the opposite approach. Every plan on the Pin pricing page is public before you talk to anyone. You get a Free plan, Solo at $99/mo, Professional at $135 per user per month billed annually ($179 month-to-month), and custom Business pricing with unlimited seats. According to Pin’s 2026 user survey, 91% of users reduced or eliminated LinkedIn Recruiter spend after switching to Pin. That kind of ROI is only measurable when you know what you’re paying from day one.
Hidden Costs and Pricing Gaps to Watch
Beyond the quoted price, Arya by Leoforce pricing has several cost variables that don’t surface until you’re deep in the sales process. Contact data quality is the most expensive one. On Capterra, one executive research recruiter wrote that contact info was “probably at least 80% of the time” inaccurate, which means paying for data that doesn’t reach real candidates.
Budget for these items beyond the listed price:
Contact Credits
Ask exactly how contact lookups are metered. Leoforce doesn’t publish credit allowances or overage rates, and high sourcing volume can inflate costs well beyond the quote. Get the per-lookup price in writing before you sign.
ATS Integration Setup
Integration coverage is broad (60+ ATS and CRM systems), but setup isn’t instant. Greenhouse’s help center says configuration can take up to a month after Leoforce receives your credentials, followed by user training. Setup itself may be included, but a month of reduced productivity is a real cost.
Contract Terms Aren’t Published
Minimum commitments, billing frequency, and cancellation terms are all undisclosed. Enterprise products at five-figure monthly price points rarely offer month-to-month billing. Ask specifically about term length, auto-renewal, and exit clauses before signing.
Onboarding and Training
Trained on data from 16,000+ recruiters, according to Humancloud’s Leoforce profile, the platform still scores just 3.8 out of 5 for functionality on Software Advice. Several reviews mention a learning curve. Factor in training time, especially if your team is used to simpler sourcing tools or manual LinkedIn searching.
Leoforce’s Product Rebrand: What Changed in 2025-2026?
In 2025, Leoforce dropped the Arya name and split its offering into five separate products, a lineup we verified on its site in September 2026. Source runs programmatic job ads, Capture delivers pre-screened candidates, Convert is a career-site agent, and Rediscovery re-engages candidates already in your ATS. The newest, Signal, is an AI sales agent that helps staffing firms turn website visitors into client leads. Old goarya.com links now redirect to leoforce.com, and the Pulse product page returns a 404.
What does this mean for buyers? First, Arya AI recruiting as review sites describe it no longer exists. Capterra and Software Advice still list the product as “Leoforce (Arya),” and most Arya by Leoforce review content dates from 2023-2024. Second, the lineup moved away from a self-serve search tool toward managed, outcome-based services.
This repositioning matters for pricing research. Comparing Leoforce to tools like Pin or Workable using older review data? Verify you’re evaluating the current lineup, not the 2023 version.
What Do You Get With Arya by Leoforce?
SHRM’s State of AI in HR report (2026) found that 27% of organizations now use AI in recruiting, the most common AI use case in HR. Within this growing market, Leoforce sells managed recruiting outcomes rather than software your recruiters work in daily. Here’s what each product delivered, and what it cost when prices were public.
Arya Pulse (Discontinued, Was $199-$599/Job)
Pulse delivered AI-matched candidate lists for individual roles. Self-service ($199) provided a ranked shortlist from Leoforce’s database, while full-service ($599) added managed outreach by Leoforce’s team. Neither tier included ongoing platform access, so your access ended when the job closed.
A 2024 vendor case study with blueStone Staffing reported a 52% reduction in time-to-submit and a 26% increase in weekly submittals per recruiter, per Humancloud. Those are solid numbers, though they reflect a single agency’s experience rather than a broad benchmark. Leoforce has since removed that case study from its site.
Arya Quantum (Discontinued, Never Priced Publicly)
Quantum was the always-on subscription: continuous AI sourcing, candidate scoring, ATS integration, analytics, and team collaboration. Without published pricing, it was impossible to calculate cost per hire before entering the sales funnel. Leoforce no longer sells it.
Leoforce Convert (Last Published at $8,000-$32,000+/Mo)
This is a career-site agent, not a sourcing tool. Convert chats with visitors on your careers page, pre-screens applicants, and routes qualified candidates into your ATS. The last public rate card, still tracked by PricingSaaS, charged $8,000/mo for up to 100,000 monthly visitors, $17,000 for up to 250,000, and $32,000 for up to 500,000. Busier sites were custom. A midsize company hiring for 5-10 roles per quarter won’t justify that spend.
Leoforce Rediscovery (Last Published at $5,000-$15,000/Mo)
Rediscovery re-engages candidates already in your ATS through automated SMS and email. Its old rate card, per the same tracker, started at $5,000/mo for up to 5 million records and 100 jobs. The top tier reached $15,000/mo for up to 10 million records and 1,000 jobs. It suits staffing agencies sitting on huge candidate backlogs. It’s redundant if your ATS already runs re-engagement workflows.
Leoforce Source, Capture, and Signal (Quote Only)
Source and Capture are the closest successors to Pulse: one buys job-ad reach, the other charges per qualified applicant delivered. Signal targets staffing firms’ sales teams rather than recruiters. None of the three has ever had a public price.
How Does Arya by Leoforce Compare to Alternatives?
Leoforce’s quote-only model doesn’t fit neatly into standard pricing categories, which makes direct comparison tricky. The alternatives below all publish prices, from free plans to enterprise seat licenses. Here’s how the numbers stack up:
| Tool | Starting Price | Pricing Model | Free Tier | AI Sourcing | Outreach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pin | Free; paid from $99/mo | Monthly or annual subscription | Yes (no CC) | 850M+ profiles | Automated email, plus LinkedIn and SMS tasks |
| Leoforce (formerly Arya) | Custom quote | Outcome-based | No | 850M+ claimed | Managed by Leoforce |
| Arya Pulse (discontinued) | $199/job | Per job | No | Yes | Full-service only ($599) |
| Workable | $299/mo | Monthly or annual subscription | 15-day trial | Limited AI matching | Basic email |
| Manatal | $15/user/mo (annual) | Per user | 14-day trial | AI recommendations | Basic email |
| LinkedIn Recruiter | $8,000-$12,000/seat/yr | Annual seat license | No | LinkedIn only | InMail only |
Comparing costs this way reveals Leoforce’s positioning problem for smaller teams. Per-job pricing looked affordable for occasional hiring, but a recruiter working 44 roles a year would have spent $8,756 or more on Pulse. Outcome-based quotes may land higher or lower, and you won’t know which until the sales process ends. A flat subscription like Pin’s gives continuous access for a predictable annual cost.
Manatal’s $15/user/mo entry point looks attractive, but its AI is limited to basic candidate recommendations rather than semantic search and deep profile matching. Workable, now from $299/mo, is a solid ATS first and a sourcing tool second. LinkedIn Recruiter lists at $8,000-$12,000 per seat per year according to Vendr, and it restricts you to LinkedIn’s own network. For deeper comparisons, see the best AI sourcing tools in 2026 breakdown.
Pin’s AI scans 850M+ profiles to find candidates across specialties and high-volume roles - try it free.
Arya by Leoforce vs. Pin: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Recruiters are stretched thin. Gem’s 2026 Recruiting Benchmarks Report puts the average load at 13.4 open roles per recruiter, with applications up 93% since 2021. Tools that combine sourcing, outreach, and scheduling in one workflow save the most time. Here’s how Leoforce and Pin compare on features that matter:
| Feature | Pin | Leoforce (formerly Arya) |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Sourcing | ✓ 850M+ profiles, semantic search | ✓ 850M+ claimed, 80+ channels |
| Self-Serve Search | ✓ Your recruiters run searches | ❌ Managed service (Source, Capture) |
| Multi-Channel Outreach | ✓ Automated email, plus LinkedIn and SMS tasks | ⚠️ Rediscovery re-engages your ATS database |
| Interview Scheduling | ✓ Included | Not listed as a product |
| Free Tier | ✓ No credit card required | ❌ No free option |
| Published Pricing | ✓ Every plan public | ❌ Custom quote only |
| ATS Integrations | ✓ Add-on on Solo and Professional, included on Business | ✓ 60+ ATS/CRM (up to a month to configure) |
| Outreach Response Rate | ✓ 5x better response rates | Not published |
Sourcing isn’t the biggest gap here, since both platforms claim large databases. What really separates them is who does the work and what happens after you find candidates. With Pin, your recruiters run the search themselves, email sequences send automatically, LinkedIn and SMS steps queue up as tasks, and interviews get scheduled. Leoforce sells finished outcomes instead, which suits agencies that want to outsource the top of the funnel but leaves in-house teams without a tool to run themselves.
As Rich Rosen, Executive Recruiter at Cornerstone Search, puts it: “Absolutely Money maker for Recruiters… in 6 months i can directly attribute over $250k in revenue to Pin.”
Who Is Arya by Leoforce a Fit For?
According to SHRM (2026), 60% of extra-large organizations (5,000+ employees) have implemented AI in HR, compared with about a third of small businesses. That adoption gap matches Leoforce’s pricing reality: the platform is built for larger teams with bigger budgets and specific use cases.
Large agencies and enterprise teams find the most value with Leoforce, specifically:
- Large staffing agencies filling 50+ roles per month that want to outsource candidate delivery. The blueStone Staffing case study showed measurable gains at high volume.
- Enterprise talent teams with existing ATS infrastructure who need a supplemental sourcing layer. The 60+ ATS and CRM integrations reduce migration friction, though configuration can take a month.
- Companies with massive candidate databases that want to re-engage past applicants through Rediscovery, last published at $5,000+/mo. If you’re sitting on millions of ATS records, automated re-engagement could surface hires without new sourcing spend.
Smaller teams and solo recruiters face specific friction points with Leoforce:
- Small to midsize recruiting teams that need predictable monthly costs. Outcome-based quotes vary with volume, and the last published enterprise rates started at $5,000/mo.
- Solo recruiters or small agencies getting started with AI sourcing. With no free tier or self-serve plan, you’re in a sales process before seeing a single candidate match.
- Teams that want to run their own searches and sequences. Leoforce sells managed outcomes rather than a seat your recruiters work in every day.
- Recruiters who want to test before buying. With no free tier, no trial, and a required demo just to learn pricing, the evaluation friction is high. Platforms with transparent pricing and free tiers let you run real searches and measure results before committing any budget.
More options enter this market every quarter. Locking into an enterprise contract without testing alternatives first carries real opportunity cost, especially when tools with lower entry points deliver comparable or broader functionality.
What Arya by Leoforce Reviews Say About Value
Across 54 reviews on G2 (22) and Capterra (32) as of September 2026, Arya by Leoforce earns a 4.0 out of 5 overall rating. Respectable, yes, but the category scores on Software Advice tell a more nuanced story: Value for Money sits at 3.9, and Functionality scores lowest at 3.8. Users seem to feel the platform doesn’t quite deliver enough relative to what they’re paying.
Common praise centers on AI matching accuracy for specific roles and the breadth of sourcing channels. Staffing-agency recruiters note that Arya surfaces candidates they wouldn’t have found through LinkedIn alone. The 80+ channel approach does broaden the talent pool, and the AI scoring helps prioritize which candidates to contact first.
Common complaints include contact data accuracy, limited pricing transparency, and a learning curve that takes longer than expected. Nearly every Arya by Leoforce review that mentions an Arya price also describes plans that have since been retired. Platforms that bundle outreach, scheduling, and CRM features into a published base price draw the sharpest contrast.
It’s also worth noting that SHRM (2026) reports 56% of HR functions don’t formally measure the success of their AI investments. If you’re considering Leoforce, define your success metrics upfront: cost per hire, time-to-fill reduction, and candidate quality scores. Then you can judge whether the platform delivers measurable ROI within the first 6 months. Without clear measurement, opaque pricing makes it nearly impossible to know if the investment is paying off.
Broader context on how AI recruiting platforms compare is in the 12 Best AI Recruiting Tools in 2026 comparison, which covers features, pricing, and use cases across the market.
Is Arya by Leoforce Worth the Price?
Gem’s 2026 Recruiting Benchmarks Report found that direct sourcing yields about 4x the hires of inbound applications. Any tool that improves outbound sourcing efficiency has measurable value. Whether Arya by Leoforce pricing delivers that value as efficiently as alternatives is a separate question, and one worth working through before signing.
Start with your own volume. Pin’s data puts the median active recruiter at 11 roles per quarter, and more than half handle 10 or more. Even at the old $199 Pulse rate, that workload cost over $8,700 a year without continuous platform access. Leoforce’s outcome-based quotes replace that math with a number you only learn after a demo.
Subscription pricing delivers more predictable costs and more features per dollar for teams filling roles regularly. Pin’s Professional plan costs $135 per user per month billed annually, or $1,620 a year for one seat. It includes AI sourcing across 850M+ profiles, multi-channel outreach with 5x better response rates than industry averages, and interview scheduling. That’s the full recruiting workflow for less than nine roles at the old Pulse rate.
Here’s one way to think about it: SHRM’s 2025 benchmarking report puts the average nonexecutive cost-per-hire at $5,475. Fill 10 positions a year and you’re looking at $54,750 in hiring costs. A tool that shortens time-to-fill and improves candidate quality by even 20% pays for itself quickly. Recruiters using Pin fill positions in an average of 14 days, while SHRM’s 2026 benchmarking puts median time-to-fill for nonexecutive roles at 39 days. That speed difference translates directly into lower vacancy costs.
Deloitte’s 2025 AI ROI study, a survey of 1,854 executives across Europe and the Middle East, found only 6% see AI payback in under a year. Most take two to four years. For recruiting teams, that means one thing: don’t overspend on your first AI tool. Start with a platform that lets you test the workflow at low cost and scale up as you prove ROI. That’s hard to do with Leoforce when every product is quote-only.
Pin is the best choice for teams that want AI-powered sourcing with transparent pricing and a complete recruiting workflow they run themselves. Enterprise teams that specifically need a career-site agent (Convert) or ATS database re-engagement (Rediscovery) will find those products well-developed by Leoforce. Budget accordingly: the last published rate cards implied $60,000 to $384,000 per year.
Get enterprise AI recruiting features at startup pricing with Pin - free to start
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Arya by Leoforce cost per month?
Arya cost per month depends on a custom quote, because Leoforce no longer publishes prices. The retired Pulse plan charged $199-$599 per job rather than a monthly fee. The last public rate cards put Convert at $8,000-$32,000+ per month and Rediscovery at $5,000-$15,000 per month. For comparison, Pin has a free plan and paid plans from $99/mo.
Is Arya by Leoforce still available?
Not under that name. Leoforce retired the Arya brand in 2025, and old goarya.com links now redirect to leoforce.com. The company now sells Source, Capture, Convert, Rediscovery, and Signal, all by custom quote. Review sites still list the older Arya Pulse and Quantum plans, so treat those prices as historical.
Does Arya by Leoforce offer a free trial or free tier?
No. Leoforce doesn’t offer a free tier or a free trial on any product. You must request a demo and go through the sales process before accessing the platform. Alternatives like Pin offer a free plan with no credit card required, letting you evaluate AI sourcing before committing budget.
How much does a LinkedIn recruiter license cost?
LinkedIn Recruiter lists at roughly $8,000-$12,000 per seat per year on an annual contract, according to Vendr, with 15-30% discounts common on multi-seat or multi-year deals. LinkedIn Recruiter Lite costs about $170/mo but limits InMails and restricts search to LinkedIn’s network. Pin has a free plan and paid plans from $99/mo, searching 850M+ profiles across professional networks, GitHub, Stack Overflow, and more.
What AI recruiting tool has the best value in 2026?
Pin offers the strongest value for AI recruiting in 2026, with a free plan and paid plans from $99/mo. It includes AI sourcing across 850M+ profiles, multi-channel outreach with 5x better response rates than industry averages, and interview scheduling. In SHRM’s 2025 Talent Trends research, nearly 90% of HR professionals who use AI tools say they save time or improve efficiency. Pin delivers those savings at a fraction of enterprise tool costs.
Is Arya by Leoforce good for small recruiting teams?
Arya by Leoforce is better suited for large staffing agencies and enterprise teams. Small teams face quote-only Arya by Leoforce pricing, no free tier to test the platform, and enterprise products last published at $5,000/mo or more. Teams under 50 employees are better served by subscription tools with published pricing and built-in outreach.
